Variable Speed Mag-Lev Chiller
FINDINGS #9, December 2013
Magnetic Levitation Chiller Compressor Reduces Space Cooling Energy
In the U.S., space cooling accounts for 9.6% of energy consumption in office buildings. Because space cooling is primarily driven by electricity—a higher cost energy source—it can account for an even greater percentage of a facility’s annual energy bill(1). Chillers, used frequently in larger facilities, provide cooling in 31% of office building floor space within U.S.commercial buildings(2).
GSA’s Green Proving Ground (GPG) recently evaluated the effect of new, more efficient chiller compressor technology on energy cost and consumption by assessing a magnetic levitation (“maglev”) chiller compressor at the George Howard, Jr. Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Pine Bluff, Arkansas. This new chiller compressor technology offers quieter, more efficient cooling at lower partial loads than rotary-screw chillers, due to its ability to reduce friction, operate at variable speeds, and integrate with diagnostics and monitoring systems. GPG’s initial findings recommend replacing end-of-life rotary-screw chillers with maglev chiller compressors.
What We Did
EXPERTS MONITORED PERFORMANCE OF OLD AND NEW CHILLERS OVER A SIX-MONTH PERIOD
In February 2012, GSA replaced one of the two 150-ton rotary-screw chillers at the George Howard, Jr. Federal Building—a four-story, 108,000 square foot courthouse and office building—with a 150-ton chiller with two magnetic levitation compressors. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) monitored the performance of both the new chiller and the remaining original chiller for a six month period from March through September to determine their cooling load profiles and project a weather-normalized assessment of energy savings offered by the new technology.
What We Measured
DATA SYSTEM RECORDED CHILLER EFFICIENCY AND UTILITY USAGE
PNNL employed an independent data acquisition system (DAS) that scanned meters and sensors every second to generate a comprehensive dataset of chiller performance. Chiller efficiency was measured with the coefficient of performance (COP) — the ratio of cooling energy provided to the amount of energy consumed. The amount of electricity demanded by each chiller was also measured and recorded. Weather data was gathered and normalized to project the performance of the chillers over a typical meteorological year (TMY).
Efficiency of New Chiller Increases as Load is Reduced. New chiller efficiency is highest between 40 to 50 tons (27 to 33% of nominal full load). Old chiller efficiency continuously decreases as chiller load is reduced.
What We Concluded
MAGNETIC LEVITATION CHILLER COMPRESSORS SHOW PROMISE FOR ENERGY SAVINGS
The test case at the George Howard, Jr. Federal Building resulted in an annualized $9,097 reduction in energy costs, or a 4.7-year payback period, after normalizing for payment structure and per-unit utility costs, supporting the assertion that maglev chiller compressors can bring considerable energy savings compared to traditional rotary-screw compressors. Similar studies conducted by the US Navy, in which only the compressor was replaced and not the entire chiller, delivered comparable energy savings and even lower simple payback. Because this technology is still young, it can be difficult to determine a reliable installation cost. Purchase and installation costs have ranged from $744/ton to $2,568/ton at GSA installations and other test sites, due to numerous variances. Still, such costs are expected to decrease as the new compressor becomes more readily available. Given these uncertainties, GSA recommends targeted deployment of this technology as an end-of-life replacement for chillers with rotary-screw compressors.
CONDUCT TESTING ON A LARGER SCALE, REASSESS THERMAL LOAD, USE DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM
The test case supported claims that maglev chiller compressors operate most efficiently at lower partial loads, but because larger chillers (i.e. with capacities between 500 and 1,000 tons) account for a greater percentage of chiller energy within GSA’s portfolio, additional testing should be undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of this technology on a larger scale.
Because chiller plant efficiency is a function of the equipment’s partial load factor, it is important to optimize the modularity of the chiller plant (e.g., two chillers at 75% load or three chillers at 50% load) based on the cooling profile of the facility. It is also recommended that the building’s thermal load be reassessed during the retrofit design phase to avoid over-sizing the cooling plant.
Water temperature resets for the cooling tower and chilled water supply are highly beneficial to chiller efficiency; the chiller can best be calibrated to meet specific cooling demand loads by maintaining control over the temperature of entering water.
The ability to monitor, diagnose, and optimize chiller performance is best captured through the use of a full dashboard system. In touring multiple GSA installations, it was noted that none of them had fully installed this capability.
For more information, contact Green Proving Ground firstname.lastname@example.org.
1. EIA (2003b), Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey: Energy End-Use Consumption Tables, Table E.1. Major Fuel Consumption (Btu) by End Use for Non-Mall Buildings, 2003, U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, http://www.eia.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/2003set19/2003pdf/e1-e11.pdf, last accessed 07/05/2012.
2. EIA (2003a), Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey. Table 8. Types of Heating Equipment Used in Office Buildings, 2003, U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, http:// www.eia.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/ officereport/office3.html, last accessed 07/05/2012.
Reference above to any specific commercial product, process or service does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.